Which UAE e-invoicing providers integrate with Microsoft Dynamics 365?

We reviewed the public materials of all 52 providers on the UAE Ministry of Finance register and found 25 that publicly claim Microsoft Dynamics connectivity. Three of the 25 are pre-approved rather than fully accredited, so 22 can be appointed today. Only 6 of the 25 name a specific Dynamics product line: six name Dynamics 365 Business Central, two name Finance and Operations, and two name the legacy NAV, GP or AX generation.

Is Dynamics 365 Business Central or Finance & Operations better served in the UAE?

Business Central, clearly, and this inverts the pattern we found for SAP and Oracle where the enterprise products dominate. Six registered providers name Business Central explicitly. Only two name Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations. If you run F&O in the UAE, only two providers on the entire register have said in public that they handle it, so the practical shortlist is very short and everyone else must be asked directly.

Does Dynamics 365 issue e-invoices by itself in the UAE?

No. Microsoft is not on the UAE Ministry of Finance register, so Dynamics cannot be your accredited service provider. You keep Dynamics as your system of record and appoint one of the registered providers to transmit over Peppol in the PINT AE format. Note also that Dynamics 365 is a family name that includes Sales, Customer Service and Field Service, which are CRM applications and do not issue the sales invoices you need to send.

Home › Guides › Dynamics 365 e-invoicing UAE

Dynamics 365 e-invoicing in the UAE: Business Central is well covered, Finance & Operations barely is

Q: How can I verify a provider really integrates with Dynamics?

A Microsoft AppSource listing is the strongest public signal, because Microsoft validates the publisher and the app targets a named product. Two providers on the UAE register have marketplace listings: Pagero has an e-invoicing app published against Dynamics 365 Business Central, and Techventures has a UAE E-Invoicing app listing. Beyond that, ask which line and version, whether the connector is certified, pre-built or bespoke, and request a sandbox test on your own data before signature.

MoF register checked 31 August 2026 · provider materials reviewed 28–31 August 2026 · how we grade this data

Answer first: 25 of the 52 registered providers claim Microsoft Dynamics connectivity, and as with SAP and Oracle, only a handful say which Dynamics — six of the 25. But here the pattern inverts. For SAP and Oracle the enterprise products were best covered; for Dynamics it is the opposite. Six providers name Dynamics 365 Business Central. Only two name Finance & Operations. If you run Business Central you have a real shortlist. If you run F&O, two providers on the entire register have said in public that they handle it, and everyone else is an open question you must ask directly.

of 52 registered providers claim Dynamics connectivity

of those 25 name which Dynamics product

of the 25 are fully accredited and appointable today

name Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations

"Dynamics 365" is the most ambiguous name in this series

SAP means three products and Oracle means four. Dynamics is worse, because the family name spans not just different ERPs but applications that are not ERPs at all:

What you might run	What it is	Why it matters here
Dynamics 365 Business Central formerly NAV / Navision	The SME and mid-market ERP.	The best-covered Dynamics product on the UAE register, and the one with a real marketplace ecosystem behind it.
Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations formerly AX	The enterprise ERP.	A different product with a different extension model. Business Central capability tells you nothing about F&O — and only two providers name it.
Dynamics NAV / GP / AX on-premise, legacy	The previous generations, still running in UAE businesses that never migrated.	Named by only two providers. If you are on NAV or GP, say so early — this is where "we support Dynamics" most often turns into a project.
Dynamics 365 Sales / Customer Service / Field Service	CRM, not ERP.	These do not issue the sales invoices you need to transmit. A provider listing "Dynamics 365" without qualification may be describing CRM connectivity.

That last row is not hypothetical. One provider's own connector list reads "Microsoft Dynamics 365 (Sales, Finance, Commerce, Field Service, Business Central)" — a mix of CRM and ERP modules in a single line. It is a fuller disclosure than most, and it still leaves you asking which module actually carries your billing.

Who names which

Provider	Business Central	F&O	NAV/GP/AX	What they publish
Techventures	✓	✓	✓	The only provider naming all three generations. A Microsoft Solution Partner with 20+ years implementing Dynamics; its UAE e-invoicing offering is built around Dynamics rather than listing it. Has a "UAE E-Invoicing" app listing on Microsoft's marketplace.
Fynamics	✓	✓	—	Lists "Dynamics 365 F&O" and "Dynamics 365 Business Central" as separate selectable options — the distinction is understood.
Citytech	✓	—	✓	A Microsoft Solution Partner focused on Business Central: "Peppol-compliant integration within Dynamics 365 Business Central", plus NAV and GP migration expertise. See the caution below.
Pagero (Thomson Reuters)	✓	—	—	Publishes a "Pagero E-invoicing" app on Microsoft AppSource targeted specifically at Dynamics 365 Business Central. Its own UAE page otherwise names only generic examples.
Advintek	✓	—	—	Names Business Central inside a longer Dynamics 365 module list that also includes CRM apps.
TronStride	✓	—	—	Lists "Microsoft Dynamics 365" and "Business Central" as separate entries.

Two Dynamics specialists — and only one you can appoint today

Techventures Fully accredited

A Dubai-based Microsoft Solution Partner with over 20 years implementing Dynamics ERP. Its UAE e-invoicing product is an extension centred on Dynamics 365 — Business Central, F&O, NAV and GP — with connectors for other systems alongside. It is the deepest published Dynamics position on the register, and it is on the accredited list, so it can be appointed now.

Citytech Pre-approved — cannot be appointed yet

A Microsoft Solution Partner focused squarely on Business Central, describing Peppol-compliant integration inside Business Central, with NAV and GP migration expertise behind it. On specialism alone it is arguably the closest fit for a Business Central shop. But Citytech is one of the four providers still in the Ministry's pre-approval stage, undergoing final production assessment — only a fully accredited provider can be appointed today. Worth watching, not yet worth signing.

That contrast is the practical lesson of this page. The most Business-Central-focused specialist on the register is currently the one you cannot use. If you are on Business Central and your deadline is 30 October 2026, you either appoint from the accredited five who name it, or you accept the risk that Citytech's full accreditation may not land in time. Track the register on our accredited list page, which we re-check and date.

Microsoft AppSource is the one verification you can do yourself

Across this ERP series we keep saying "ask which line". For Dynamics there is a check you can run in a browser in two minutes: a Microsoft AppSource listing. Microsoft validates the publisher, and the listing is published against a named product, so it cannot be as vague as a logo on a website.

Two providers on the UAE register have marketplace listings: Pagero, with an e-invoicing app published against Dynamics 365 Business Central, and Techventures, with a UAE E-Invoicing app listing. That is 2 of 25 claimants with marketplace-verified presence.

Read the absence carefully. No AppSource listing does not mean no capability — plenty of good connectors are delivered as private extensions or bespoke integrations and never reach the marketplace. It means one particular independent verification is unavailable to you, so you have to get the assurance another way: named line and version, connector type, and a sandbox test on your own data. That is the same rule set out in our methodology: read silence as unanswered, never as no.

The other 19 name no line at all

Comarch, Complyance, Covoro, Cygnet, Flick Network, HAMT/EVATRA, Infinite IT, Information Dynamics, InvoiceNow, InvoiceQ, Marmin, McBitss, Orchida, Skill Quotient, SunTec, Suntech, Taxilla, Victorian and Zennovate all reference Microsoft Dynamics without naming a product. Two are worth singling out: Orchida is again the only provider on the register using the phrase "native, pre-built, bi-directional connectors" — which for Dynamics matters, because one-way extraction leaves your finance team reconciling outside the ERP. And InvoiceQ's Dynamics claim reaches us through a third-party software directory and its Jordan site rather than its UAE pages, which is a weaker source than the provider's own UAE material.

The one Dynamics claim confirmed to us in writing Data confirmed ✓

Of the 25, one has been confirmed directly by the provider rather than read off a website: Complyance confirmed on 31 August 2026 that Microsoft Dynamics is among its API connectors, alongside SAP, Oracle, Odoo, QuickBooks, Zoho, Tally and Xero, with AI-assisted field mapping. The same confirmation covers onboarding of 3–5 weeks with sandbox access, multi-TRN under a single account, inbound AP as well as outbound AR, published SLAs (P1 30-minute response, 4-hour resolution), SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and a free full data export on exit. Complyance does not name a Dynamics line either — so even here, question 1 below stays open. That is what "confirmed" honestly covers, and what it does not.

Six questions to send before you sign

Which Dynamics product and version?

"Business Central 2026 wave 1 cloud", "F&O 10.0.x", "NAV 2018 on-premise". If the answer is "Dynamics 365", ask again — it may even be the CRM.

Is it an AppSource app, a private extension, or a bespoke build?

Three different upgrade risks. Ask specifically who re-tests the connector when Microsoft ships its twice-yearly Business Central release wave.

Does it write status back into Dynamics?

Only one provider on the register publicly says bi-directional. Make everyone else state it, or your AR team lives in a second portal.

How are multiple legal entities and TRNs handled?

Unpublished for 27 of the 52 providers. Dynamics groups often run several companies in one environment — confirm this maps cleanly to separate TRNs.

Inbound (AP) as well as outbound (AR)?

The UAE model is a five-corner exchange; you will receive as well as send. Get it in the contract, not the demo.

Sandbox test on our own Dynamics data before signature?

A demo on the vendor's tenant proves nothing about your dimensions, number series or posting groups.

The ERP-agnostic version is in the twelve questions to ask before signing, and the wording that makes competing quotes comparable is in which ASP should you choose.

The dates you are working against

30 October 2026

Appoint your provider — businesses with revenue ≥ AED 50M

1 January 2027

Mandatory go-live for that first group

31 March 2027

Appoint your provider — all other businesses

1 July 2027

Mandatory go-live for everyone else

Business Central shops are usually the quickest of any ERP family to integrate, because the marketplace ecosystem exists. F&O shops should start earliest of all: two named providers is not a competitive tender, and the moment you need a third quote you are commissioning discovery work. Details in the four deadlines, and on who runs the mandate in MoF versus FTA.

الملخص بالعربية

من أصل 52 مزوّداً في السجل، 25 يدّعون التكامل مع Microsoft Dynamics، وستة فقط يسمّون خط المنتج. لكن النمط هنا ينقلب عمّا وجدناه في SAP وOracle: هناك كانت المنتجات المؤسسية هي الأفضل تغطيةً، وهنا العكس. ستة يسمّون Business Central، واثنان فقط يسمّان Finance & Operations. فإن كنت تشغّل F&O، فمزوّدان فقط في السجل كلّه قالا علناً إنهما يتعاملان معه.

و«Dynamics 365» أكثر الأسماء التباساً في هذه السلسلة، لأن العائلة تضمّ ما ليس نظام تخطيط موارد أصلاً: Dynamics 365 Sales وCustomer Service وField Service أنظمة إدارة علاقات عملاء (CRM) ولا تُصدر فواتير المبيعات التي تحتاج إلى إرسالها. فمن يكتب «Dynamics 365» دون تحديد قد يصف اتصالاً بنظام CRM لا بنظام الفوترة.

ومتخصّصان اثنان، أحدهما فقط يمكن تعيينه اليوم: Techventures شريك حلول لمايكروسوفت بخبرة تتجاوز 20 عاماً، ومنتجها للفوترة مبنيّ حول Dynamics (Business Central وF&O وNAV وGP) — وهي معتمدة بالكامل. أمّا Citytech فمتخصّصة في Business Central تحديداً وتصف تكاملاً متوافقاً مع Peppol داخله — لكنها قيد الاعتماد المبدئي ولا يمكن تعيينها اليوم. أي أن الأقرب تخصّصاً هو الذي لا تستطيع استخدامه، وهذا هو الدرس العملي لهذه الصفحة.

وتحقّق واحد تستطيع إجراءه بنفسك في دقيقتين: إدراج التطبيق على Microsoft AppSource — فمايكروسوفت تتحقّق من الناشر، والإدراج يكون مقابل منتج مُسمّى. مزوّدان فقط من الـ25 لديهما إدراج: Pagero (تطبيق فوترة مقابل Business Central) وTechventures. وغياب الإدراج ليس نفياً للقدرة — فكثير من الموصلات الجيدة تُسلَّم كامتدادات خاصة — لكنه يعني أن وسيلة تحقّق مستقلة غير متاحة لك، فاطلب البديل: اسم الخط والإصدار، ونوع الموصل، واختباراً على بياناتك قبل التوقيع.

ومؤكَّد واحد كتابةً من الـ25: Complyance أكّدت في 31 أغسطس 2026 أن Dynamics ضمن موصلاتها، ومعها تشغيل 3–5 أسابيع وبيئة اختبار، وتعدد سجلات ضريبية تحت حساب واحد، واتفاقية مستوى خدمة معلنة، وتصدير كامل للبيانات مجاناً عند الخروج. ومع ذلك لا تسمّي خط Dynamics — فيبقى السؤال الأول مفتوحاً حتى في الحالة المؤكَّدة. اقرأ الدليل الشامل بالعربية ←

Need this for your Dynamics estate, not in general?

Tell us which Dynamics product and version you run, your entity and TRN count, and monthly volume — we come back with the providers that actually fit, free, within two business days.

Start my free provider match → Browse all providers →